Netgate Discussion Forum
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Search
    • Register
    • Login

    CWWK AlderLake-N100 Power Consumption

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Hardware
    5 Posts 3 Posters 1.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • K
      kenw
      last edited by

      I run pfsense CE 2.7.2 on the following hardware:

      CWWK AlderLake-N100 CPU with 5 i226-V NICs, Samsung 8GB DDR5 4800 MHz PC5-38400 SODIMM and Intel OPTANE P1600X Series 118GB NVME drive.

      4 of the 5 NICs have active connections. At idle my Kill-a-watt device shows 13 watts used. Is this reasonable for my configuration? Are there any suggestions on how to reduce power consumption even more?

      keyserK johnpozJ 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • keyserK
        keyser Rebel Alliance @kenw
        last edited by

        @kenw Yes it is - I don’t think you will be able to reduce that much further with 4 out of 5 NICs linked and using DDR5 memory and an optane drive. Starting to change hardware to save additional power will never be a good businesscase because the hardware cost will take tens of years to recoup by saving perhaps up to a watt or two per change (memory, SSD).

        What you could do is check if your BIOS supports underclocking/undervolting the CPU/Memory. By reducing the base and especially the max turbo frequency you can both undervolt the CPU and perhaps the memory. That could likely save you perhaps 2-3w in IDLE and maybe 6-10w under load in your setup. With hardware like that I would not expect you will notice/measure any performance degradation by fx. Reducing base frequency a couple of 100Mhz, and reduce Turbo to half the current max, and then try to remove .1v or maybe even .2v from the CPU and memory voltage.

        Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • keyserK
          keyser Rebel Alliance @kenw
          last edited by

          @kenw But be advised: reaching a stable undervolted setup can be a real PAIN in the A** as it will require a lot of testing and crashes/reboots/console access. So I would never embark on that adventure when it comes to a firewall :-)

          Love the no fuss of using the official appliances :-)

          K 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • K
            kenw @keyser
            last edited by

            @keyser

            Thank you for your help. I will leave things as is.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • johnpozJ
              johnpoz LAYER 8 Global Moderator @kenw
              last edited by johnpoz

              @kenw as mentioned by @keyser even if you could shave off a few watts - is it worth the risk that might come with instability? Your not talking from going from 100w to 10w, lets say you could save 2 watts.

              In the big picture at say 15 cents per kwh.. Do the math.. Your talking like $2.63 over the year..

              And you might be below that or even if you were paying 50 cents a kwh your only talking $8.77 over the year..

              This cost savings are in no way worth any effort even, or the risk of problems.

              Now if you were talking say changing some hardware or whatever and went from 150W to 10 watts.. So a savings of like 180 dollars a year.. Hey such a savings might be worth even changing hardware - because you might recoup the cost of the new hardware in a few years.

              An intelligent man is sometimes forced to be drunk to spend time with his fools
              If you get confused: Listen to the Music Play
              Please don't Chat/PM me for help, unless mod related
              SG-4860 24.11 | Lab VMs 2.8, 24.11

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • First post
                Last post
              Copyright 2025 Rubicon Communications LLC (Netgate). All rights reserved.